Sunday 3 May 2015

Mozarabic chant in deepest Suffolk Sacred Mysteries


Article written by  Christopher Howse of the Daily Telegraph. For link to original article, click here.


Bury St Edmunds finished its Gothic cathedral only 10 years ago. Its choir keeps up a centuries-old tradition.

I found myself in St Edmundsbury Cathedral last week just before they were to sing Evensong. So I stayed, and I’m glad I did.
Apart from anything else, a good way to appreciate a building is to see it put to the use it was designed for. As the church of St James, it was completed at the beginning of the 16th century by John Wastell, the designer of Bell Harry, the great tower of Canterbury Cathedral. As the cathedral of the diocese centred on Bury St Edmunds, it was not finished until 2005.
Its completion was thanks to Stephen Dykes Bower, the architect who had given St Paul’s Cathedral in London a baldacchino over the high altar that most tourists take to be the work of Wren himself. Dykes Bower designed for St James’s a choir in place of the chancel built by George Gilbert Scott in the 1860s. On his death in 1994 Dykes Bower left a couple of million towards the completion of the central tower, which is reminiscent of Bell Harry, as noted by James Bettley the author of the new Pevsner volumes for Suffolk to be published in April. To me it looks good externally, from the town (pictured) or abbey ruins, and internally it accentuates the soaring impetus of Wastell’s tall nave and the sparely decorated piers and walls of the choir.
In its stalls a choir of boys and singing men sang a very Anglican service for the dozen regulars sitting beside them. I suppose the service was for God really, and the regulars were listening in and saying their prayers. The liturgy was Book of Common Prayer, with Psalm 50 in Coverdale’s precise language made exotic by antiquity: “For all the beasts of the forest are mine: and so are the cattle upon a thousand hills.” To Orlando Gibbons’s music they sang a motet by the curiously minded Phineas Fletcher: “Drop, drop, slow tears, / And bathe those beauteous feet / Which brought from Heaven / The news and Prince of Peace.”
I doubt that even Fletcher, for all his learning, would have known the recessional chant, with which most churchgoers are now familiar under the title “Lent Prose”. It has the refrain, “Hearken, O Lord, have mercy upon us, / For we have sinned against thee.” The refrain is often sung in its original Latin, which is quite easy for the congregation to pick up: Attende, Domine, et miserere, quia peccavimus tibi.
The standard C of E translation is by C S Phillips – not a very widely known name, but a contributor to the Plainchant Hymnbook of 1932, promoted by Hymns Ancient & Modern. Phillips’s version was broadcast in the BBC radio prime-time Good Friday service of 1934.
When most people see in their hymnbook that Attende, Domine is “Mozarabic, 10th century”, I think they leave it at that. To be precise, it is from the Preces at the short office of Sext on the Thursday after Passion Sunday in the Mozarabic breviary. The Mozarabs, it is worth saying, did not use Arabic in their liturgy but, as the Christians living under Arab rule in Spain, used Latin, like the rest of the Western Church from Ireland to Milan. The enlightened antiquarianism of the Renaissance Cardinal Ximenes and his successors preserved its use in Toledo.
But the refrain of the hymn is not Mozarabic at all. It was spliced on by the scholar of Gregorian chant, Dom Joseph Pothier (1835-1923). He had joined the abbey of Solesmes under the great Dom Prosper Guéranger. Their life’s work was to refound the monastic life that the Revolution had extirpated in France, and to revive Gregorian chant for the whole Church. In 1901, the French again banned monks, so Solesmes took refuge on the Isle of Wight.
By this roundabout route we are left with Attende, Domine, the tune taken, like the refrain, from a Paris Processionale of 1834, but of earlier origin. Its medieval Latin poetry is miraculously effective: Dextera Patris, lapis angularis, via salutis, janua caelestis – “Right hand of the Father, cornerstone, way of salvation, gate of heaven, wash away the stain of our offences.” Just right for Lent in Bury St Edmunds.

Flying Tutu sculpture fetches R850 000


Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu jokes with artist Ed Young
at the unveiling of "The Arch" at Idasa in 2010 (Image: 
Idasa/Flickr.com)

Contemporary South African art proved to be a big seller at a Strauss & Co auction held on Monday night in Cape Town.
The sale achieved a total of R50-million with a value sell-through rate of over 84%, once again the highest in the current market, the auctioneer said in a statement.
'The Arch' by Cape Town-based artist Ed Young (Photo: Siobhan Cassidy)
A popular work by Ed Young of Emeritus Archbishop Tutu swinging from a chandelier sold for R852 600, far exceeding pre-sale estimates of between R450 000 and R550 000.
The sculpture depicts a flying Tutu, smiling as he holds on to a chandelier. The sculpture was commissioned in 2010 by the Institute for Democracy in SA (Idasa). The Arch was sold to a private buyer after Idasa closed in 2013.
In a preview of the sale, Strauss & Co wrote on its website: "Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Mpilo Tutu, the first black Anglican archbishop of Cape Town, well known for his steadfast and unapologetic public voice, is also celebrated for his good humour. Upon seeing Ed Young's super-realist sculpture depicting a likeness of him swinging from a chandelier, Tutu laughed and pulled a fist at the work's creator. 'I'll send you bad dreams,' he told Young."
Full article click here.

Holy Land groups pave path to peace with commonality and trust

It may be a cliché to say that water knows no boundaries, but for Elizabeth Koch-Ya’ari, navigating the stream of ecology and peace making is bringing together Israeli, Palestinian and Jordanian environmentalists – people of different faiths from neighbouring communities – to mobilize and build friendships around their common source of life.
As a project coordinator with EcoPeace Middle East, Koch-Ya’ari leads a campaign to rehabilitate the Jordan River. Once a vital source of clean water throughout the Holy Land, the river has been sullied by untreated sewage and drought during the past 50 years.
“We come together and we use environment as a platform for peace-building,” Koch-Ya’ari told Episcopal News Service following a presentation in Tel Aviv in January, when she met with a United States interfaith delegation that visited the region on pilgrimage.

“It’s an amazing opportunity to enter into understanding these different communities that are bordering each other, that share the same water resources, that share the environment,” she said. “In this area of the world, water can bring us together, because water does not see all these walls and borders that we put between each other.”
The Jordan River has major significance in Judaism, Christianity and Islam as the site where the Israelites crossed into the Promised Land, where John the Baptist baptised Jesus, and where Prophet Mohammed foretold an event that happened years later.
EcoPeace has created a toolkit of resources for Jewish, Christian and Muslim communities, called Water and Ecology in the Jordan River, to encourage faith-based education and engagement around the issue of water.
“The reality is that many people who live along the Jordan River don’t experience its benefits. In many parts of its flow, it’s dirty, polluted, [and] it disappears in dry seasons of the year,” Episcopal Church Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, one of the pilgrimage co-leaders, told ENS while visiting the Yardenit Baptismal Site along the Jordan River in the Galilee region of northern Israel.
“The work of the EcoPeace institute is to gather people from both sides of the river, from different faith traditions in neighbouring communities, to advocate and work for improvement of the water situation, to understand each other’s needs, and they come to understand each other as friends in doing that work,” she said. “It’s true peace-building work.”
“Communities across this region share so much,” Koch-Ya’ari said of the Holy Land. “Water is a basic part of life and to join together to rehabilitate shared water streams like the lower Jordan River, we gain a lot, not only for the environment but also to learn about each other, about our different faith communities and about how we can help each other [and] our shared ecosystems.”
Koch-Ya’ari is one of a number of leaders of grassroots initiatives in the Holy Land with whom the U.S. interfaith delegation met during its Jan. 18-27 pilgrimage. She and other grassroots leaders are certain that these sorts of initiatives will be the key to building the trust and breaking down the barriers that will ensure a lasting peace in the region long after the politicians broker any kind of deal.
Back in January, the interfaith group heard how Lior Frankiensztajn’s world changed a few years ago after he welcomed a Palestinian man into his home for two months. He got to learn many things about himself and his roots, but most importantly, he saw “how reality looks from a different perspective,” he told the interfaith pilgrims following lunch in a Tel Aviv restaurant. Unfortunately, “politicians manage the relationships, which limits the opportunity for progress. … There has to be a different approach to policymaking, to education.”

Article extracted from one published on the Episcopal Church on-line news service. Click here for the full article.

Prince Charles - Defender of the (Eastern) Faith?

Prince Charles has a new obsession as strong as his passions for ecology and architecture. He is refusing to stand idly by as Christians are driven out of the Middle East.

Photo Credit AP

Who is the most formidable defender of persecuted Christians in the world today? Many would nominate Pope Francis, who has offered thunderous denunciations of attacks on the faithful ever since his election. But another candidate is emerging: the surprising figure of the future king of England.
The media have barely noticed that the Prince of Wales has a new obsession, as powerful as his passions for architecture and the environment: the persecution of Middle Eastern Christians. And as that region deteriorates, this may well be the subject that dominates his reign.
Soon after ISIS slaughtered 21 Christians on a beach in Libya, the Coptic Church in Britain launched an appeal for the martyrs’ children. It found an immediate high-profile backer in Prince Charles, who contacted the Copts without any prompting (he also wrote a letter of condolence to the Coptic Pope Tawadros II).
Bishop Angaelos, General Bishop of the Coptic Church in Britain, says: “Prince Charles wanted to donate the money out of a sense of solidarity and he was happy for this to be publicised to raise awareness. It was a way of showing other people that it was all right to support this.”
The Prince first reached out to the Copts in 2013, shortly after the worst anti-Christian violence in Egypt in centuries. The events were barely reported in the English-speaking press and were downplayed by the US State Department. Copts felt deserted by their friends and vulnerable before their enemies.
That was when the Prince’s private secretary approached Egyptian Christians in England. The Prince then visited the Coptic Centre in the UK, along with a Jordanian prince. There, Bishop Angaelos presented two Coptic icons as gifts, one of St George as a present for Charles’s first grandchild, George. “It was very sincere,” Bishop Angaelos recalls. “He made an impromptu speech and was well informed, and he seemed to have read up. He seemed empathetic.”
The Prince has also helped other Eastern Christians in peril. Last September he gave a donation to Aid to the Church in Need’s campaign to help the Iraqi and Syrian faithful. He wrote a letter to Chaldean Patriarch Louis Raphael Sako, saying he was “heartbroken” by events in Iraq. Again, it was the Prince who approached the charity indirectly through mutual acquaintances. John Pontifex, ACN’s head of press, says the Prince “feels passionately about the decline of Christianity in the Middle East” and that “it means a great deal to him”.
Last December the Prince recorded a video address for the launch of ACN’s Religious Freedom in the World 2014 report. This was a tremendous coup for a Catholic charity that was launched after the Second World War to assist the faithful living under Communism.
Charles spoke touchingly of the “mounting despair” at the situation in the Nineveh Plains region of Iraq, where ISIS fighters had driven out Christians, Yazidis and unorthodox Muslims. He said it was “an indescribable tragedy that Christianity is now under such threat in the Middle East – an area where Christians have lived for 2,000 years”, and where people of different faiths had lived together peaceably for centuries.
Late last year he made three visits to eastern Christian congregations in London. In November he addressed the congregation at St Yeghiche Armenian Church in South Kensington, where he spoke of his sorrow at the “soul-destroying tragedy” facing Christians in the Middle East. The Prince described the faith as being “quite literally, grotesquely and barbarously assaulted”.
In December he made two trips to congregations of Syriac speakers whose brethren are now facing genocide in Iraq and Syria. At the Chaldean Catholic church in Acton, he joined in the Lord’s Prayer in Aramaic, the language of Christ, and spoke at length with the faithful. At the nearby Syrian Orthodox church he said: “I have been deeply distressed by the horrific scenes of violence and bestial brutality coming out of the Middle East – where Christianity was born – including from countries, let us remember, like Syria, to which St Paul went to preach the Gospel and where Christians have lived peaceably with their neighbours for nearly 2,000 years.”
He also hoped that Westerners would not “forget our brothers and sisters whose faith is, quite literally, under fire; not to forget the unimaginable barbarity”.
“He’s very conversant with the issues,” John Pontifex says. “We’ve been very impressed by his knowledge. He has a great deal of understanding. He’s aware of the sensitive issues between the different communions. His understanding is far greater than the average person might expect.”
He adds: “In a world marked by religious illiteracy and which lacks confidence in talking about religion, here is a figure who does get it, and the role Christianity plays as a bridge-builder. He’s hastened the day when you can truly say we have woken up to the reality of the situation.”
Charles is a deeply religious man. When he ascends to the throne he will be arguably England’s most theologically literate monarch since the union. While his faith is not straight-down-the-line Anglicanism, it isn’t as esoteric or wacky as the press has long made out.
Born to be supreme governor of the Church of England, Charles was baptised in the Music Room at Buckingham Palace 30 days after his birth by the then Archbishop of Canterbury, Geoffrey Fisher. At university in Cambridge he corresponded with the Anglican Bishop of Southwark, Mervyn Stockwood, a leading liberal who spoke of “the Saviour’s oneness with nature” and encouraged clergy to wear jeans in public. Later Charles was influenced by the mysticism of his great mentor, the South African writer Laurens van der Post, who encouraged the Prince “to see the old world of the spirit”.
The Prince’s formative years gave him a wide-ranging interest in religions and what unites them. Cardinal Vincent Nichols has said that Prince Charles seems “thoroughly at home” in Westminster Cathedral and that “when he is abroad he happily goes to Mass, and is at peace with that”.
Charles is also fascinated by Judaism and, especially, Islam. He believes that “the future surely lies in rediscovering the universal truths that dwell at the heart of [Abrahamic] religions”.
What is less well known and understood is the extent to which the Prince feels a deep spiritual connection to Orthodox Christianity. It is this, more than anything else that explains why he is leading a passionate campaign to save the eastern faithful. Such is his closeness to the faith that many Greek Orthodox believers think he has secretly converted. If that were true, it would pose a huge constitutional dilemma.
But it is undoubtedly the case that Orthodoxy looms large in Charles’s life and family history. His great-aunts Alexandra and Elizabeth converted to Orthodoxy and are considered martyrs, murdered by the Bolsheviks along with so many of the Prince’s blood relations in Russia. Charles’s grandmother was an Orthodox nun. Princess Alice, who endured a number of difficulties in her life, including deafness, schizophrenia and the Nazi occupation of her Greek homeland, is considered a Righteous Among the Nations for her role in saving Jews during the War. A woman of noted holiness, she founded an order of nuns in 1949 after her husband Andrew’s death.
When Alice’s youngest child, Philip, married Princess Elizabeth of England, he was required to join the Church of England. But he has maintained links with the Greek Church and there have often been rumours of his return. His mother was given a small Orthodox chapel that she used until her death in 1969, when her remains were buried at a Russian Orthodox convent in Jerusalem, as she had wished.
Prince Charles has always been drawn to Orthodox Christianity’s rugged spirituality. He likes icons and reading the Greek mystics. There are Byzantine images in The Sanctuary, the simple chapel in the grounds of his home at Highgrove House in Gloucestershire, where he goes to pray and meditate. At his marriage to Camilla, the Creed was recited in Old Church Slavonic.
Charles has also received regular visits at Highgrove from Ephraim, abbot of the ninth-century Vatopedi monastery on Mount Athos. The Prince flew to Athos a few days after the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, a period of intense crisis for him, his children and the whole royal family. Alone with Ephraim in the chamber there, Charles is rumoured to have made a “spiritual commitment” to Orthodoxy. After one of his visits to Mount Athos, a monk was quoted in a newspaper saying Charles was “Orthodox in his heart”.
None of this, however, has ever been officially confirmed and should probably be regarded sceptically. Charles’s attachment to Orthodoxy is probably above all an expression of his desire to bring the branches of Christianity closer together. Catherine Mayer, author of the recently published biography Charles: The Heart of a King, says: “He thinks that the schism was a shame. He thinks the branches of Christianity had more in common than they appreciated.”
Mayer suggests the Prince has been campaigning on behalf of persecuted Christians for much longer than most people realise. “It’s been gathering pace because it’s become more urgent,” she says.  But, she adds, the media aren’t really interested and find his comments on the environment, architecture and Islam much more appealing. “He sees Islam as part of the same tradition as Christianity and Judaism, and he cares about interfaith work as much as architecture and the environment. But its all part of the same world view about the need for faith. He thinks modernism is profane – it’s anti-sacred.”
For Charles, Middle Eastern Christians are a vital link between east and west, and their destruction would make any sort of deeper understanding impossible. As he told the Syrian Orthodox churchgoers: “At a time when so little is held sacred, it is quite literally diabolical that these symbolic bridges should be so destroyed.”
If any single figure can help to save Middle Eastern Christianity, it is surely the Prince. Christians in the Middle East have to rely on the support of local Muslims and, as Mayer says, “he is respected there so he has more clout when he says something”.
The situation has now reached a crisis point, almost a century after the great tragedy began. Charles’s father grew up in the wake of the First World War, a period when Bolsheviks and fascists were tearing down the old order of which he was a part. Philip came of age after the great genocide of Christians in the Ottoman Empire. The events of 1915 have scarred the psyche of Greeks, Armenians and Syriacs alike.
Those terrible developments are this year reaching a new and horrendous climax. So it is perhaps not surprising that Charles – this British prince with a Greek heart – should see it as his role to be defender of the Eastern faith.
This article appeared in the Catholic Herald and was written by Ed West, the deputy editor of the Catholic Herald. It was written as a "Comment/Feature". 
Click here for the original published article.

Has the UK has become less of a Christian country?




Seventy-three per cent of those questioned said that they agreed that Britain had lost some part of its Christian heritage and culture since 2010. Just 15 per cent disagreed.

The poll was commissioned by Christian Concern at the end of March. It found that people were more split on whether Britain's Christian heritage still mattered.

Forty-seven per cent said that it continued to bring benefits to the country; 32 per cent (including one fifth of those who identified as Christians) said that the UK's Christian heritage was "largely outdated".

In the poll, 55 per cent of respondents agreed that Easter was still primarily a Christian festival; but 33 per cent preferred the statement: "In modern Britain, Easter is rightly more about having two bank holidays together rather than anything religious." Even 18 per cent of Christians agreed.

Christian Concern said that the poll also showed how the public backed their campaigns to support "Christian freedoms". Sixty-six per cent of those surveyed, including 80 per cent of Christians, agreed that the right to wear Christian symbols while at work should be protected by law.


Andrea Williams, Christian Concern's chief executive, said that ensuring legal protection for Christians should be a key issue in the election. "Political leaders have ducked their responsibility to defend Christians over the last five years, yet now they want Christians' votes."

With thanks to "The Church Times"

The Tablet lays open its archives to celebrate 175 years of publication


The Easter Vigil service at Westminster cathedral, the largest Catholic church in England and Wales. 
Photograph: David Levenson/Getty Images
Wealth of letters to Catholic paper exposes depth of anti-papist prejudice in Victorian England and gives glimpse into lives of poor, working-class Catholics

In 1846 the Hon Charles Tennyson d’Eyncourt, MP for Lambeth and uncle of the poet Alfred Lord Tennyson, wrote to all the daily papers to deny a truly scandalous rumour which had just reached him: that his family had converted en masse to Roman Catholicism.

His letter was reproduced in the Tablet, and is revealed in a wealth of letters exposing the depth of anti-Catholic prejudice in Victorian England as the newspaper opens its archives to celebrate its 175th year of unbroken publication.

The source of the shocking allegation was apparently the Irish newspapers – and it would particularly have pained Tennyson d’Eyncourt, whose social pretensions were legendary. He had expanded his name from plain Tennyson by adding an old name from his wife’s family – though he failed to revive the d’Eyncourt peerage and acquire a title – and his home by turning it into a Victorian imitation of a medieval castle. He had aspirations towards poetry himself, and described his nephew’s work, some of the best loved in the English language, as “horrid rubbish”.

In fact the story was partly true: his eldest daughter had indeed become a Catholic, which he wrote “pains me deeply”. However, “for myself and every other member of the family … we remain unshaken in our firm attachment to the Protestant religion”.

Other letters in the Tablet archives give a sad glimpse of the lives of poor working-class Catholics, often from an Irish background.

On Ash Wednesday 1842, a priest called William Hunt tried to get to the deathbed of a teenage servant called Mary. He was turned from the door by her employer: “After stigmatizing the Catholic religion as devilish and idolatrous, the curse of the nation, absolutely refused to let me see the poor girl.”

One CF Kershaw wrote in 1843 that many were immediately rejected by Protestant families if they disclosed that they were Catholics and, if they were accepted, told they must go to regular Protestant services. “One was told … as to the Catholic Chapel, she must not even look towards it.”

The extent of the prejudice shocked many Protestants. In 1908 an Anglican deacon wrote after a Catholic procession was banned: “To every sane man it must appear intolerable that, while rowdy mobs of unemployed are allowed to parade the length and breadth of the country, rousing in many places fear and dislike, an orderly procession of Catholics, including ecclesiastics of the highest rank, should be forbidden at the behest of a handful of intolerant and intolerable fanatics.”


Despite the evidence of abundant prejudice, the Tablet carried many reports of conversions to Catholicism. In February 1846 those converted after a retreat at Mount St Bernard, a Cistercian monastery in Leicestershire, included “an honest Protestant”, “a woman who was a sinner”, “a Greek schismatic from Russia”, along with an Orangeman, a modern philosopher and “one socialist”.

With thanks to the Guardian Newspaper - Link to Original article - Click here